How we rate each operator
The methodology gives the most weight to how clearly a bonus's conditions are disclosed and how they compare with the ceiling this site treats as acceptable, because a wagering requirement decides whether an offer is worth anything once it is read past the headline. Licensing status and the presence of independent dispute resolution carry substantial weight too, since they determine what recourse exists if something goes wrong. Deposit and withdrawal terms, and whether restrictions are stated upfront rather than buried, are weighted next. Marketing language, site design and anything cosmetic carry little to no weight: they say nothing about whether an offer can actually be cleared or a complaint resolved.
- payout speed 40%
- support 20%
- game variety 15%
- mobile 15%
- bonus value 10%
These weights were set by editorial on and are fixed for this site. Changing them changes the ordering, and the change is recorded.